Skip to content

Node.js Loaders Team Meeting 2021-12-07 #54

Closed

Description

@mhdawson

Time

UTC Tue 07-Dec-2021 18:00 (06:00 PM):

Timezone Date/Time
US / Pacific Tue 07-Dec-2021 10:00 (10:00 AM)
US / Mountain Tue 07-Dec-2021 11:00 (11:00 AM)
US / Central Tue 07-Dec-2021 12:00 (12:00 PM)
US / Eastern Tue 07-Dec-2021 13:00 (01:00 PM)
EU / Western Tue 07-Dec-2021 18:00 (06:00 PM)
EU / Central Tue 07-Dec-2021 19:00 (07:00 PM)
EU / Eastern Tue 07-Dec-2021 20:00 (08:00 PM)
Moscow Tue 07-Dec-2021 21:00 (09:00 PM)
Chennai Tue 07-Dec-2021 23:30 (11:30 PM)
Hangzhou Wed 08-Dec-2021 02:00 (02:00 AM)
Tokyo Wed 08-Dec-2021 03:00 (03:00 AM)
Sydney Wed 08-Dec-2021 05:00 (05:00 AM)

Or in your local time:

Links

Agenda

Extracted from loaders-agenda labelled issues and pull requests from the nodejs org prior to the meeting.

nodejs/loaders

  • Add hook for manifest loading #44
  • Design doc for reuse of defaultResolve #33
  • Feature request: Utility functions for the steps of resolution and loading #26

Invited

  • Loaders team: @nodejs/loaders

Observers/Guests

Notes

The agenda comes from issues labelled with loaders-agenda across all of the repositories in the nodejs org. Please label any additional issues that should be on the agenda before the meeting starts.

Joining the meeting

Activity

  1. self-assigned this
    on Dec 3, 2021
  2. GeoffreyBooth commented on Dec 3, 2021

    @GeoffreyBooth
    Member

    These agenda items are the same ones from last time. I forgot to remove the agenda label.

    Do we need any further discussion on these, or on anything else?

  3. DerekNonGeneric commented on Dec 4, 2021

    @DerekNonGeneric
    Contributor

    Maybe we should reconvene after the holidays — it would give us the time for experimentation w/ the current iteration of the hooks system before we discuss chaining. I somewhat have a feeling that we are going to need one more iteration of the hooks system before we should feel confident enough in our API to incorporate chaining into the equation.

  4. JakobJingleheimer commented on Dec 4, 2021

    @JakobJingleheimer
    Member

    I think we don't need to re-visit these. I don't have anything new yet and won't have finished any implementations to discuss those. I'm picking up https imports today, but I doubt that'll be done by Tuesday.

    I see Maël has opened a PR though (I'm looking at it this morning too).

  5. arcanis commented on Dec 4, 2021

    @arcanis
    Contributor

    Yep I have open my PR, but given the short amount of time until the meeting I feel like it should be fine to make the first few iterations async via the PR comments, and see whether it stabilised enough to discuss the remaining bits in January?

  6. GeoffreyBooth commented on Dec 7, 2021

    @GeoffreyBooth
    Member

    Okay so per these comments I assume we should cancel for tomorrow?

  7. DerekNonGeneric commented on Dec 7, 2021

    @DerekNonGeneric
    Contributor

    This agenda — it looks to be very pertinent, and they are all things that I would be interested in having a conversation about — things that may be long overdue for us to discuss…

    At the moment, I am a bit bogged down w/ other things. Still, I would be interested in discussing these topics in greater length, but whether I see myself jumping on a conference call tomorrow afternoon is another story. 🙃

    Is anyone else planning to attend? I may be able to show up if others want to have a chat.

  8. JakobJingleheimer commented on Dec 7, 2021

    @JakobJingleheimer
    Member

    Mm, I think the time today might be better spent reviewing Maël's PR and implementing the other PRs.

  9. GeoffreyBooth commented on Dec 7, 2021

    @GeoffreyBooth
    Member

    Okay sounds like we should cancel this one. I'll remove the agenda label from those issues, please add it to anything you want to discuss next time.

  10. DerekNonGeneric commented on Dec 7, 2021

    @DerekNonGeneric
    Contributor

    Why remove agenda label? Those are all valid issues!

  11. GeoffreyBooth commented on Dec 7, 2021

    @GeoffreyBooth
    Member

    Why remove agenda label? Those are all valid issues!

    They were all discussed at the last meeting. If you or anyone else would like to discuss them at the next meeting, just add the label back. Once an issue is discussed at a meeting, we take the label off unless folks in the meeting say that they want to continue discussing that topic at the next meeting, but that didn’t happen for any of these last time.

  12. DerekNonGeneric commented on Dec 7, 2021

    @DerekNonGeneric
    Contributor

    They were all discussed at the last meeting.

    Where is that recording?

  13. GeoffreyBooth commented on Dec 7, 2021

    @GeoffreyBooth
    Member

    Where is that recording?

    @bmeck was the host. #53 (comment)

  14. bmeck commented on Dec 7, 2021

    @bmeck
    Member

    @GeoffreyBooth YouTube failed to stream with some kind of permissions issue so it got synced to the Zoom cloud again.

  15. DerekNonGeneric commented on Dec 17, 2021

    @DerekNonGeneric
    Contributor

    What was even discussed? Nothing actionable, I presume. I don't have those Zoom cloud credentials, AFAIK. It would be great if @GeoffreyBooth (or someone) could somehow share that (put it on YouTube) if it still has any relevance.

  16. GeoffreyBooth commented on Dec 19, 2021

    @GeoffreyBooth
    Member
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions